Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:45
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Cholesterol-lowering drugs help combat Alzheimer’s disease - The Brighter Side of News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
New Study Reveals the #1 Sleep Mistake That Harms the Brain - AOL.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ad eveniet eaque et magni illum.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump and Washington Are Making Tons of Noise. Why the Stock Market Will Be Just Fine. - Barron's
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why didn't people like the Game of Thrones ending?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
If sea levels were rising, wouldn't the acreage of coastal salt marshes increase? Are they?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Young researcher’s ALS attack plan is now a no-go - Harvard Gazette
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
What the Texas food label law means for the rest of America - The Washington Post